Quote:
Originally Posted by saberhagen
Not gonna lie, continuing to argue this when you?ve been given clear explanations is kinda delusional.
We all know it?s expensive, no need to micromanage TH?s office expenses.
|
I was waiting on one of your famous bootlicking posts, thanks for joining the party!
anyone that believes the vIgo's 99.99% explanation also probably believes Santa Clause lives in the North Pole.
Quote:
Originally Posted by generalszabo
I know some of this is tongue in cheek but the price has been set. If you don't like it, don't buy it. They won't bring the price down just because you beg them to
|
Thanks for recapping the facts of the situation.
and i appreciate you taking the "i
f you don't like it, don't buy it statement" out of the attic. reminds me of the Bowen days, thank you for that!
this forum is the ideal place to discuss topics like Tweeterhead price gouging their loyal 1:6 collectors, while offering a 1:4 statue of th same piece for a better value. All while TH failing to acknowledge there iss little to no R&D costs on one of the two pieces as they are based on the same exact sculpture which HAD to reduce the cost somewhere somehow...but it didn't as the 1:6 prices continue to rise like flood waters. but we as "uninformed collectors" must realize the fact the prices were set based on 99.99% of the factory quote + other miscellaneous expenses...like shipping containers that are basically at 2019 levels
but we should listen too vIgo, he's being 100% ...sorry 99.99% honest with us.