Statue Forum 





Go Back   Statue Forum > Other Stuff > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-21-2008, 03:25 AM   #11
geto10
Yeah, I spend WAY too much time here!
 
geto10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: http://belgianfriday.blogspot.com/
Posts: 10,793
I had the 24-105, but switches to 24-70 which I love.. Very sharp and fast!
geto10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 03:48 AM   #12
HoldyourfireAl
Kindly Asked To Leave
 
HoldyourfireAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by geto10 View Post
I had the 24-105, but switches to 24-70 which I love.. Very sharp and fast!
But don't you miss the reach? What was wrong with the 24-105?
HoldyourfireAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 08:41 AM   #13
Kujo
Cross country skiing is great if you live in a small country.
 
Kujo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Preston, England
Posts: 1,908
I have the 24-105 and its a really great lens. Its become my working lens now as its got a good range and really sharp shots. I haven't done any statue shots with this yet, its too dark when I get home from work!

This was an attempt at doing a HDR shot.


This is just a normal shot. Both handheld.

Kujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 02:16 PM   #14
geto10
Yeah, I spend WAY too much time here!
 
geto10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: http://belgianfriday.blogspot.com/
Posts: 10,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoldyourfireAl View Post
But don't you miss the reach? What was wrong with the 24-105?
Nah, tbh I don't really need 105mm.. way too much.. 70mm is perfect for me.
geto10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 03:22 PM   #15
Upitnik
Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity.
 
Upitnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 326
My main problems with zooms are: the picture quality lacks that of primes and the weight of 2.8 zooms is too much. Handhelding 70-200 f/2.8 on a session with kids is ridiculous. And only with f/2.8 and faster lenses will the vertical line-sensitive sensor at the center AF point function to attain high-precision focusing which is in my experience a big deal. But for studio shooting the 24-105 is without a flaw. I repeat MY EXPERIENCE.
Upitnik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 03:39 PM   #16
P1X4R
...
Producer
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: .
Posts: 11,209
beautiful shots guys! the 24-105 is a joy to shoot outdoors.


P1X4R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 04:01 PM   #17
HoldyourfireAl
Kindly Asked To Leave
 
HoldyourfireAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 425
Let's keep talking!

HoldyourfireAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 04:20 PM   #18
P1X4R
...
Producer
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: .
Posts: 11,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upitnik View Post
My main problems with zooms are: the picture quality lacks that of primes and the weight of 2.8 zooms is too much. Handhelding 70-200 f/2.8 on a session with kids is ridiculous. And only with f/2.8 and faster lenses will the vertical line-sensitive sensor at the center AF point function to attain high-precision focusing which is in my experience a big deal. But for studio shooting the 24-105 is without a flaw. I repeat MY EXPERIENCE.
i favor primes myself. i especially love the 135L. sharp wide open! i rarely shoot wide but this lens excels at f/2!

i just threw a monkey wrench at ya Al!
P1X4R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 05:23 PM   #19
HoldyourfireAl
Kindly Asked To Leave
 
HoldyourfireAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by P1X4R View Post
i favor primes myself. i especially love the 135L. sharp wide open! i rarely shoot wide but this lens excels at f/2!

i just threw a monkey wrench at ya Al!
My main problem is this...

I have the stock lens, but it isn't the sharpest.

I have the 60mm lens, but when taking pics of people at events or buildings or other objects, it's a pain because I have to move sooo far away!

I love the sharpness of the 60mm, but I need something that's both versatile & sharp. I want to be able to take a pic of my nieces in the backyard & capture a rabbit or bird that is out of reach with the 60mm.
HoldyourfireAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2008, 06:37 PM   #20
Tyz1on
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
 
Tyz1on's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 1,102
I would go with what seems to be one of the most versatile and highest quality lens that I have seen recommended on this forum and a few others as well. Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens. It's on my shopping list. I hope to have the 17-55 and an L series zoom telephoto as my two carry around lens'. For the L series I was thinking either the 70-200mm f/2.8 L "IS" lens or the EF 100-400mm f/4.5- 5.6L IS USM. After that I will look for some primes like the 50mm f/1.4 USM to do controlled shots.
Tyz1on is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright StatueForum.com