Quote:
Originally Posted by MrYac
there is too much partisanship in the world especially in the gaming world, but I was just making a joke at that specific review Damirn just posted
the only positive things are the superficial, graphics and music yet it still got an 8.5? that's kind of hilarious at face value and you've got to admit it.
|
I agree, looks odd. But a screenshot of a tiny summary list of pros/cons doesn't help us figure it out. If he posted a link to the review that could be read it might give some context. Could also read the comments to see if readers had questioned the score and any potential clarification the reviewer gave from that.
That said, even the 85 they gave is one of the lowest scores the game has received. It's now the highest rated PS4 game ever. My point is, if reviewers are supposedly paid off/scared to give a 1st party Sony game a low score, did they all have to rate it so high??? I mean, couldn't you keep sony happy and give more realistic scores of the game sucks so bad? I have a working theory, maybe the game really just is good even though there is obviously a segment of gamers that don't want it to be...