|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
02-13-2012, 01:07 AM
|
#9981
|
|
Kindly Asked To Leave
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 24,710
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellboy
Yes Transformers 3 was shot in "native" 3D (not converted) using PACE 3D cameras.
TRON: Legacy was shot and completely conceived in 3D as well using Sony's F35 3D cameras.
|
I thought as much, given the nature.. and complexity.. of the cgi footage. Thanks, Scott. 
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 01:18 AM
|
#9982
|
|
I don't have a solution but I admire the problem.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Land of sweat
Posts: 2,504
|
StarWars Episode 1 - 3D ( 2/10 for the 3D .. nothign was added except mking things darker and blurrrier) i enjoy any SW movie.. so 8/10
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy - 6/10 .. Please enlighten me wht the big deal was.. i went in with huge expectations .. to watch an intelligent cerebral movie.. sigh..
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 01:22 AM
|
#9983
|
|
Have you ever imagined a world with no hypothetical situations?
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SoCal-L.A.
Posts: 8,717
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellboy
Watched it for a second time last night with my girl. She loved it and I can now definitively say that it was my favorite film of 2011. Brilliant stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 11:57 AM
|
#9984
|
|
Galactus
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Farmers Branch
Posts: 30,626
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by supahman
StarWars Episode 1 - 3D ( 2/10 for the 3D .. nothign was added except mking things darker and blurrrier) i enjoy any SW movie.. so 8/10
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy - 6/10 .. Please enlighten me wht the big deal was.. i went in with huge expectations .. to watch an intelligent cerebral movie.. sigh.. |
damn those intelligent cerebral movies! lol
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 12:13 PM
|
#9985
|
|
curmudgeon Mod
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Shire
Posts: 35,072
|
Sherlock Holmes a game of shadows 8/10. Liked it as much as the first one.
__________________
Snakes! Why'd it have to be snakes?
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 01:10 PM
|
#9986
|
|
Phoenix
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 12,152
|
Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) 7.5/10
Had forgotten what a booze soaked flick this was. Bourbons offered as a pod converts on the home-bar pool table; dry Martinis near the gazebo where yet another set of pods converts, Martinis at an empty supper-club. These pod-people really had to learn to drink.
Still, just a great, fun sci-fi classic. We watched it on family-movie night & my kids loved it. Some fun scares & a great plot.
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 02:39 PM
|
#9987
|
|
It's not hard to meet expenses, they're everywhere.
Adamantium Plus Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,918
|
A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas - 7/10 - I liked this a lot more than I expected. The first one was better, but this was probably the second best. Thomas Lennon can make me laugh just sitting and doing nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 02:44 PM
|
#9988
|
|
Ghost
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 8,648
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by protector2814
Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) 7.5/10
Had forgotten what a booze soaked flick this was. Bourbons offered as a pod converts on the home-bar pool table; dry Martinis near the gazebo where yet another set of pods converts, Martinis at an empty supper-club. These pod-people really had to learn to drink.
Still, just a great, fun sci-fi classic. We watched it on family-movie night & my kids loved it. Some fun scares & a great plot.
|
A truly great classic sci-fi film. Though the 1978 remake has some good moments, it doesn't hold up like the original, IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 02:48 PM
|
#9989
|
|
Phoenix
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 12,152
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babytoxie
A truly great classic sci-fi film. Though the 1978 remake has some good moments, it doesn't hold up like the original, IMO.
|
It dates a heck of a lot more than the 50's one. I prefer the 56 one by a mile, even though, you're right, the Sutherland one does have its moments. Have you seen the latest, w/ Nicole Kidman?
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 03:03 PM
|
#9990
|
|
Ghost
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 8,648
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by protector2814
It dates a heck of a lot more than the 50's one. I prefer the 56 one by a mile, even though, you're right, the Sutherland one does have its moments. Have you seen the latest, w/ Nicole Kidman?
|
Why no, I hadn't even thought of that one. I did check some sites for it. From what I've read, I'm guessing it's not too good?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM.
|
