|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
10-05-2015, 07:45 PM
|
#11
|
|
Shadowhawk
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 918
|
Nope. It's product. I bought it, I own it. Does any other manufacturer of anything receive a percentage of any future sale?
|
|
|
|
10-05-2015, 07:50 PM
|
#12
|
|
Baron Zemo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: we know each other, he's a friend from work
Posts: 16,341
|
I am thinking absolutely not. You don't see Van Gogh making claims like that, he ain't no jerk.
|
|
|
|
|
10-05-2015, 08:12 PM
|
#13
|
|
Justice League
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 261
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joefixit2
I am thinking absolutely not. You don't see Van Gogh making claims like that, he ain't no jerk.
|
lol....I've always had positive experiences with Van Gogh. great dude, real fan friendly
|
|
|
|
|
10-05-2015, 08:13 PM
|
#14
|
|
Producer
Producer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,922
|
Now that this thread has mentioned his name several times and even quoted him, we all owe Neal Adams $1,000 each.
No, ownership is just that. If you bought it legally, then it's yours and you can and should be able to do as you please with it. By this logic, we should give Honda a cut every time one of their cars changes hands and I owe Sony some money for an old TV I sold a couple years back.
|
|
|
|
|
10-05-2015, 08:46 PM
|
#15
|
|
Hellfire Club
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 4,163
|
Neal forgot to disclose that the signature on the coa will cost an extra $40.
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2015, 12:46 PM
|
#16
|
|
Borrow money from a pessimist, they don't expect it back.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by punisher129
Neal Adams may have the biggest ego in comics
|
I didn't realize this was ever in question. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2015, 12:52 PM
|
#17
|
|
Mephisto
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 405
|
No, if I purchased it, it's my property to do with as I will. Given the significance of this cover, it blows my mind that the seller agreed to this and that anyone would sign that form of Barry Windsor Smith's. Where was the decry by Adams posted, Gerry?
Edit: After thinking about it, the only reason that I could see the owner of this piece agreeing to splitting proceeds with Neal, is if he and his family had planned to file a lawsuit in an attempt to get the piece returned to them.
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2015, 01:19 PM
|
#18
|
|
Angry Green Rage Monster Mod. SMASH!
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anger Management
Posts: 43,815
|
I guess I would need to know how "equitable" is defined in the terms of the agreement. The seller is obviously not required to share any of the proceeds of the sale of the artwork, so it appears that they came to a split that was comfortable to them. Do we know how the equity is split on this sale?
__________________
 
CAF
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2015, 01:35 PM
|
#19
|
|
Statue Forum MacDaddy
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,077
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc McCoy
No, if I purchased it, it's my property to do with as I will. Given the significance of this cover, it blows my mind that the seller agreed to this and that anyone would sign that form of Barry Windsor Smith's. Where was the decry by Adams posted, Gerry?
Edit: After thinking about it, the only reason that I could see the owner of this piece agreeing to splitting proceeds with Neal, is if he and his family had planned to file a lawsuit in an attempt to get the piece returned to them.
|
its in the wording of the auction . . .
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2015, 04:01 PM
|
#20
|
|
Mephisto
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 405
|
Thanks, serves me right for not looking past the art!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 AM.
|
