Bumped down to statues - others

[dao2]

Originally Posted by Jeffle323

Where's the outcry and rage towards companies like PCS? No working website with order information...Akuma bust, Balrog, teela, Skeletor bust, Gouken, Milenna, jade, subzero , trap jaw. 9 delayed statues... As of this year

A) the order info isn't that big a deal, least not for me nor does it sem a stickler for most people. ARH recently lost theirs and also didn't really cause a huge stir.
B) sideshow delays their statues just as badly
C) i like how you somehow imply PCS doesn't constantly get ---- for having delayed statues :P

Overall they are a better company and keep us more up to date with delays (seriously the delay notifications we get from SS are just because we get the final payment continually pushed back except for the once in a while rare message about it).

They deliver what they promise too, their CS is better (and takes just as long to respond nowadays which is sad cause it's literally two people), they have a QC guy in china and their advertise realistically what they can deliver.

The delays suck, and everyone wishes it was shorter, neither PCS or SS are immune to it. At least PCS offers you a full refund including deposit if it's been pushed back more than 6 months while SS told me last time that they'll use my one time courtesy of moving the NRD to another statue :|

[dechirico7]

I was biking all day. What did I miss?
Can someone sum it up in a paragraph? lol
I see Sideshow is back in their spot.

[strife87]

Originally Posted by dechirico7

I was biking all day. What did I miss?
Can someone sum it up in a paragraph? lol
I see Sideshow is back in their spot.

d rod cleared it up a few pages ago, basically it was an accident they were added in the same spot one section down.

[strife87]

Originally Posted by d rod

To answer the question, nothing has happened. I was in the program side organizing and by accident, it seems, I moved Sideshow to the same place but in a different section.

It's taken me this long to notice because I have been in the University until a couple of hours ago.

At least it gave everyone something to talk about for a day!

here it is

[dechirico7]

That d rod, he so silly.

[Synzaic]

Originally Posted by strife87

d rod cleared it up a few pages ago, basically it was an accident they were added in the same spot one section down.

I still think this is a cover up. I heard xm hacked the forum and bumped sideshow down.

[JP Sarri]

Originally Posted by Synzaic

I still think this is a cover up. I heard xm hacked the forum and bumped sideshow down.

That's the best answer I have heard all day.

[SDguy]

LOL

[The Mule]

Originally Posted by JP Sarri

Opinion is not a fact.

In my experience, people pull the "tastes are tastes" and subjectivity points when they're losing an argument.
Forget for a minute to win this argument at any cost (which really, seems your only point so far), I'm just talking of design and art direction. Not technique, rendition, details, which one is "better" (that's very subjective and I agree).
On one side, character standing in an awkward pose and on a plain base, on the other side, character flying with a flaming bird. Now give me your honest opinion about which one is a more creative and impressive design.
That's my point and really, doesn't need more proof than the actual statue, you're the one claiming to know how approvals work so you could shed some light and give some facts about why certain companies seem have more innovative designs approved while Sideshow is limited in their creative choices. Your post implied that it's not actually Sideshow's directives to limit their artists, but approvals, so please share any proof.

[nbr3bagshotrow]

Originally Posted by The Mule

In my experience, people pull the "tastes are tastes" and subjectivity points when they're losing an argument.
Forget for a minute to win this argument at any cost (which really, seems your only point so far), I'm just talking of design and art direction. Not technique, rendition, details, which one is "better" (that's very subjective and I agree).
On one side, character standing in an awkward pose and on a plain base, on the other side, character flying with a flaming bird. Now give me your honest opinion about which one is a more creative and impressive design.
That's my point and really, doesn't need more proof than the actual statue, you're the one claiming to know how approvals work so you could shed some light and give some facts about why certain companies seem have more innovative designs approved while Sideshow is limited in their creative choices. Your post implied that it's not actually Sideshow's directives to limit their artists, but approvals, so please share any proof.

could very well be that Sideshow, from communication from their fans, have determined that a majority of their fans prefer museum style poses. At least I do.