JND Studios: 1:3 Catwoman - Tim Burton's 1992 Batman Returns.

[NorthernLadMSP]

Yep, agreed. The pose is almost identical to the P1, so to call that cutesy is laughable.

Also, what's up with this teeny weeny wall behind her? It looks kind of ridiculous.

[Shoo]

Sharper screenshot by jaklynfiorhollyw:

[SDguy]

Originally Posted by superdude

I'm liking the pose so far. It's subtle, but feels much more like the Selina of the movie than the overly cutesy P1 pose.

She literally skips and jumps rope through a mall LOL.

[SDguy]

Originally Posted by Shoo

Sharper screenshot by jaklynfiorhollyw:

Those legs/lower body are a bit sus to me right now... she was rail thin in that movie.

[Shoo]

Originally Posted by SDguy

Those legs/lower body are a bit sus to me right now... she was rail thin in that movie.

Also posted by jaklynfiorhollyw:

Originally Posted by jaklynfiorhollyw

I love stuff like this. I did revert the film image on the left but you get the idea. Great side by side of her.

[SDguy]

Is that side by side supposed to change my mind? It didn't lol.

[Shoo]

Well, it's certainly not the best angle as far as her thighs are concerned, but I'm just trying to add some perspective. : )

[jeremydmc]

Originally Posted by SDguy

Those legs/lower body are a bit sus to me right now... she was rail thin in that movie.

I agree, my eyes went straight to her legs in the photo.

[ukshaun]

Originally Posted by Shoo

Sharper screenshot by jaklynfiorhollyw:

I have to admit, when i focus in on the portrait, the profile shot pictured,
it looks possibly too angular around the chin / jaw line, looking somewhat pointy.
Best wait and see for higher resolution images to be released.

I sense the position of the portrait, looking downwards, feels off.
I want to put my finger under her chin and push upwards.
It is like her outfit does not fit correctly, forcing an unnatural posture around the neck area.

[pdenham]

Originally Posted by Silas Loki

With respect to your opinion, to me, this statement feels like a pedantic "cope".

When I saw this 2nd teaser, my first thought was - this is exactly the same as the Blitzway piece....but at a premium cost increase.

On the topic of the cat - honestly, I couldn't give a greasy rat's ass crack for the quality of the cat sculpt - I'm personally a figure collector - but if you guys are willing to take a dollar value enema for the benefit of a great sculpture of an alley cat - be my guest.

...

As I stated earlier, I would take the Blitz/P1 over this, even if the "collector's premium" put the prices near par. Beyond a stellar portrait, the body attitude simply has more personality and a quirk of life to it.
Plus it's easier to maintain if left open.

I also realize that almost no one here is going to want to pay a premium surcharge for a nicely sculpted cat.

However if someone does go with this, for whatever reason, I think they will find that the main thing that puts this into the "wow, this really looks realistic in person" is going to be the statue as a whole, which translates to the presence, and quality, of the cat, more so than simply the figure & portrait itself.

I also agree that the perfunctory balcony looks odd. It seems to only be there to get the cat off the ground and make it more of another distinct focal point.