Quote:
Originally Posted by supermetroid
I'm sure you'd call him that to his face lol. As far as the superteams are concerned I really wouldn't put any of his above these: Today's Warriors, 90's Bulls, early 00's Lakers heck the 80's Celtics and Lakers were pretty stacked. But I'd say if you removed him from his teams it would have more effect than removing any one player from those teams. Even the Bulls made it to the playoffs when Jordan left.
|
Anyway not the best comparsions you made. Other teams, even GS, got mostly only one "new" good player in addition. And GS also lost a very good player, now topscorer of his new team. Lebron needs to change whole teams, and get 3-5 good players, plus 1 or 2 superstars. That´s the poor thing. I can´t look up on those pussy players like lebron; the way he fires most of all other players of his "new team".
If he would have been back to Cleveland, and let the old team stay (mostly) as it is; then I would say Lebron is great. Or even go to another good team , who loses a very good player then in exchange.
But he didn´t care about the old veteran players there. He surely even didn´t care about cleveland.
He only wanted another ring. Poor it is this way.
He even could have gone to a unknown d-league team, change whole team and get a ring this way. SUCKS.
The way he has always chosen: nearly every player of the top10 may get a ring this way. Just collect the best players around themselfes. Only problem .. u need defense too..
NBA comes in danger of having "one half" very good teams , and "another half" losing all their good players and suck around. Could make NBA bit boring with such a difference. Would be sad.