General Posters & Prints

[Hellboy]

I quite like this fun 'Aliens' print by Mark Daniels...

[RadicalThrasher]

Originally Posted by Hellboy

I quite like this fun 'Aliens' print by Mark Daniels...

Change that print up a little, and it could be Starship Troopers. But i like it!

[ReplicantSavior]

I thought Starship Troopers too. But it is a good print of that type. Not what I'm looking for though. I want the Alien and Aliens double. Same with Terminator and T2. Mondo needs to find more artists other than Martin Ansin who can pull that sort of thing off.

[jimmmy]

I saw that mark daniels print, looks good...I'm a big fan of his Star Wars trilogy. Dark ink have also got a nice predator print by dan Mumford up tomorrow.

[Simplyrob]

As an owner and fan of the Daniels SW set, I can honestly say, the Aliens piece looks like every shade of baby diarrhea green was used.

[Simplyrob]

Been awhile since I bought anything print related. Got way too much, but, I was eyeing today's Tom Whalen metal drop. They use shopify so you can hoard an item for 10 minutes or whatever it is. This one said "sold out" but wasnt finalized so I kept refreshing until it added to my cart. Woohoo! My first Whalen!

"Harpoon'd" 1/1 8"x8" Metal

[brentflynn]

Originally Posted by jimmmy

I saw that mark daniels print, looks good...I'm a big fan of his Star Wars trilogy. Dark ink have also got a nice predator print by dan Mumford up tomorrow.

Predator print looks great, I'd get it if the shipping didn't double the price.

[FROBAY]

I had to post this over here as I think a lot of the NON print collectors don't fully understand archival framing. Here is Sideshows post about their Kier print framed.

Originally Posted by SSAlex

Unframed prints will be shipped rolled.

The framed versions are not 100% archival in nature as the plexi within the frame does not have 100% UV protection. The board backing and hinging utilize archival methods. Additionally, framed prints will NOT use dry mounting, so people wishing to remove them from their framing and matting may do so at any time (but we of course always recommend when removing your print to take special care when doing so).

I think for 200.00 a uv glass should have been used. I'm gonna be out another 80$ or so having this reframed with the correct glass. I think this is another example of Sideshow just not going all the way with their high end collectible products.

[pavehawk78]

Originally Posted by FROBAY

I had to post this over here as I think a lot of the NON print collectors don't fully understand archival framing. Here is Sideshows post about their Kier print framed.



I think for 200.00 a uv glass should have been used. I'm gonna be out another 80$ or so having this reframed with the correct glass. I think this is another example of Sideshow just not going all the way with their high end collectible products.

Sideshow's price point on these prints is outrageous.

[Hellboy]

Originally Posted by FROBAY

I had to post this over here as I think a lot of the NON print collectors don't fully understand archival framing. Here is Sideshows post about their Kier print framed.

I think for 200.00 a uv glass should have been used. I'm gonna be out another 80$ or so having this reframed with the correct glass. I think this is another example of Sideshow just not going all the way with their high end collectible products.

Wow! They obviously don't know what they're doing with these then. At least give collectors the option. This will keep me from getting anything from them unfortunately.