Quote:
Originally Posted by Vracula
Umm I think u wanted to see a documentary.
|
No. I wanted to see authenticity.
When you're doing a movie about historical facts, you need to be accurate on the facts.
We should have seen many boats : more destroyers than shown on the screen.
We should have seen military vehicles on the beach as it was the case.
We should have seen an air battle as it was the case with many planes involved : Messerschmitts, Stukas, Heinkels, Hurricanes, Spitfires. We only see 3 Spitfires, two Heinkels. And we barely see two Stukas...
And it seems there were no Messerschmitts int he movie but Bucchons instead...
Heinkels are bombing boats... but it's not the best plane to reach the target. We should see Stukas instead who can bomb a target within 3 meters.
In the movie at the beginning, the british soldiers are fired by german soldiers. But at that time they're were outside Dunkirk due to the french army resistance.
And we see post 1950 buildings, mobile harbour crane that didn't exist prior to 1950.
Just thinking the people behind the movie didn't do the job correctly with 200 millions dollars...
The movie lacks CGI effects to give more authenticity and accuracy.
For me it's Nolan worst movie
Just take a look at the
Atonement and you see what Dunkirk's beaches should look like during a great sequence shot.