|
06-09-2015, 11:18 AM
|
#2
|
Captain Marvel
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Land of the Free and Home of the DD's!
Posts: 3,278
|
For the uninitiated, can you provide a an explanation as to the size differences on screen?
For instance, how would this display differently on an IMAX or Cinemark XD screen?
|
|
|
06-09-2015, 11:40 AM
|
#3
|
Have you ever imagined a world with no hypothetical situations?
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SoCal-L.A.
Posts: 8,717
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanky Panky
For the uninitiated, can you provide a an explanation as to the size differences on screen?
For instance, how would this display differently on an IMAX or Cinemark XD screen?
|
Here you go:
https://www.groupon.com/articles/what-is-70mm-film
|
|
|
06-09-2015, 12:51 PM
|
#4
|
Have you ever imagined a world with no hypothetical situations?
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The BUCKEYE State
Posts: 9,924
|
I will be making the trip to see Hateful 8 the way it is meant to be seen. Hopefully there is a theater not too far out of the way.
|
|
|
06-09-2015, 03:33 PM
|
#5
|
Captain Marvel
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Land of the Free and Home of the DD's!
Posts: 3,278
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelito
|
Thank you my good man. Here's an excerpt that blew my mind. I can see why studios and theaters aren't willing to invest into 70mm despite the crisper picture. Physically it's just too much of a hassle.
Each reel is about twice as heavy as a normal 35mm reel,” McLaren points out. Interstellar, for example, came on 49 reels and weighed more than 600 pounds in total.
|
|
|
06-09-2015, 04:31 PM
|
#6
|
Have you ever imagined a world with no hypothetical situations?
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SoCal-L.A.
Posts: 8,717
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanky Panky
Thank you my good man. Here's an excerpt that blew my mind. I can see why studios and theaters aren't willing to invest into 70mm despite the crisper picture. Physically it's just too much of a hassle.
Each reel is about twice as heavy as a normal 35mm reel,” McLaren points out. Interstellar, for example, came on 49 reels and weighed more than 600 pounds in total.
|
If you look on youtube you'll find some videos of projectionists preparing for screenings of Interstellar or The Master, which are two recent 70mm releases.
Those are some big reels!
|
|
|
06-09-2015, 11:56 PM
|
#7
|
Captain Marvel
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Land of the Free and Home of the DD's!
Posts: 3,278
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelito
If you look on youtube you'll find some videos of projectionists preparing for screenings of Interstellar or The Master, which are two recent 70mm releases.
Those are some big reels!
|
Wow! You aren't kidding. Found one that is a good example of just how large the film reels are, along with the prep work involved.
Definitely can see why studios are abandoning this method. Not sure the cost/investment is worth it.
Still pretty neat to watch the process.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKxIcMoJaWA
|
|
|
06-10-2015, 12:01 AM
|
#8
|
Mod Assassin
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Makena's Kennel.
Posts: 33,959
|
Personally I don't think it stands a chance. Even IMAX are moving to digital. The proposed Avengers Imfinity War will be shot on those new Digital cameras. It will be interesting to see how they differ from current technolog.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 12:36 AM
|
#9
|
Captain Marvel
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Land of the Free and Home of the DD's!
Posts: 3,278
|
There are obviously a lot of pros to switching to digital in terms of production, preview of dailies, and output.
There's also a part of me that is torn about it, in a similar way to how some comic artists use the Wacom tablet to draw.
There's no original art to trace back to in terms of a physical copy.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 AM.