Statue Forum 





Go Back   Statue Forum > Other Stuff > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-05-2009, 10:25 AM   #31
Zurbaran1
Mod Guru
 
Zurbaran1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York/Spain
Posts: 12,787
Upitnik. Thanks for taking the time to go through the detailed description on your lenses. Very helpful information.
Zurbaran1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 04:17 AM   #32
speedracer
I was trying to daydream, but my mind kept wandering.
 
speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: www.pinoystatueforum.net
Posts: 2,686
Those are beautiful shots up..I likewise have the 5dm2..its a beautiful piece of equipment. here are some of my pics from a gaming convention..=)

Tack Sharp isnt everything, But it's really nice to have..



I like wise use the 50 1.4..Love it!!!!
24-70, 70-200 2.8 IS is grrrrrrreat especially with full frame. =)
speedracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 12:09 AM   #33
rxj71
Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity.
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 340
I have a quick qn. for the pros over here... I got myself last year the 5D (not the mark II) and I love it. So far I only have the 100mm Macro lens for it as I wanted to capture flowers. I've been looking at the 28-300 zoom and I was wondering if it's any good. I'd like to do some wildlife and nature fotography and I'm sure the the zoom is not as good as say the 300mm f/2.8 but I'm thinking the 28-300 would offer a lot of convenience???
rxj71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 04:50 AM   #34
Upitnik
Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity.
 
Upitnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxj71 View Post
I have a quick qn. for the pros over here... I got myself last year the 5D (not the mark II) and I love it. So far I only have the 100mm Macro lens for it as I wanted to capture flowers. I've been looking at the 28-300 zoom and I was wondering if it's any good. I'd like to do some wildlife and nature fotography and I'm sure the the zoom is not as good as say the 300mm f/2.8 but I'm thinking the 28-300 would offer a lot of convenience???

http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff...8300_3556is_5d
Upitnik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 04:53 AM   #35
Upitnik
Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity.
 
Upitnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedracer View Post

Tack Sharp isnt everything, But it's really nice to have..
Yes it is
Upitnik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 01:24 AM   #36
rxj71
Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity.
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upitnik View Post
Thank you for the help. Instead of the 28-300 would you recommend the 100-400? The 5D doesn't have as high a resolution as the 5D MarkII and I don't know if I see myself shooting in RAW format and modifying the images afterwards.

Here's the second or third picture I took when I got the camera.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0079_small.JPG
Views:	7
Size:	38.7 KB
ID:	47649  
rxj71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright StatueForum.com