Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkfan
If you guys realized just how freakin' HUGE that Optimus piece is, you might be more forgiving of the missing right arm... I think it looks fine that way. I remember hearing all kinds of complaints back when we were doing some busts in the Palisades GI Joe line that way.... Try to do something a little different creatively and people freak out. No sense of vision.
|
I don't understand how the size of the bust can make up for the missing right arm. Even if it were slightly smaller, wouldn't the addition of the right arm just make it bigger (and much better) anyway?
When I see these 1 arm busts, I can't help but to feel like the sculpture is a half-assed job, by attempting to either cut down on costs, or cut down on sculpting time. I'm not saying that's the case, but that's just the impression I get when I see these types of statues. I mean, what's the purpose? Is this a bust, half statue, or as one person pointed out to me, a "handicap" of the character? For example, I showed a picture of the bust to someone who knew nothing about the characters (or comic statues for that matter) and they asked me if the "black ninja" cut the robots arm off and is ready to leap out of his hand before the robot collapses. D'oh! That wasn't exactly how I was seeing it, but I clearly understood the reason for the misunderstanding.
I think whoever designed the statue, should have asked themselves if the bust would look better with 2 arms and if the answer were "yes", then they should have gone through with it. It's this type of effort that makes a statue stand out from the crowd.