|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
12-06-2006, 02:46 AM
|
#791
|
|
Zot
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,616
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by d rod
if i'm correct, it goes by division winner, then record. what i pasted on the site is what they show on EA. in other words, division record only helps to determine division winner. after that, it goes by best record. so technically you can have all the teams from one division (that being six) and just two from the other (division winner and then one with best overall record)
|
That totally contradicts what you have been saying all season though... when we brought this up to you 3 or 4 weeks ago... you said that playoff spots would be determined by Division Record... now it is Overall Record? I am more confused now than I was 3 or 4 weeks ago..
Not that it matters... I am a f'ing 7 game loosing streak...
|
|
|
|
12-06-2006, 09:34 AM
|
#792
|
|
I went to a general store. They wouldn't let me buy anything specifically.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,292
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by d rod
if i'm correct, it goes by division winner, then record. what i pasted on the site is what they show on EA. in other words, division record only helps to determine division winner. after that, it goes by best record. so technically you can have all the teams from one division (that being six) and just two from the other (division winner and then one with best overall record)
|
OKay this makes sense. So we have division winners determined by division record, and then 6 remaining wild card teams determined by overall record, and there doesn't have to be equal representation from each division.
Well my chances are extremely dim, but if I do manage to win this week, I might be able to just sneak in provided some other teams lose. Whoohoo
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2006, 08:47 PM
|
#793
|
|
The Rock
Adamantium Plus Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 9,686
|
since this is my first year playing this, are the teams allways this close? Also did everyone enjoy it enough to do it again next year?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2006, 09:38 PM
|
#794
|
|
The Stones, I love the Stones. I watch them whenever I can. Fred, Barney...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Jersey
Posts: 3,375
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ickwinzs
since this is my first year playing this, are the teams allways this close? Also did everyone enjoy it enough to do it again next year?
|
hell yeah...this is my 3rd year doing fantasy leagues...iwoud definitly do it again next year.... 
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2006, 09:59 PM
|
#795
|
|
I went to a general store. They wouldn't let me buy anything specifically.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,292
|
I've done fantasy for a few years now... I've seen close leagues and blowout leagues... but yea this has been fun and I'd most definitely be in again next year!
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2006, 11:25 PM
|
#796
|
|
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,002
|
Count me in too. I can never get enough of this stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2006, 01:50 AM
|
#797
|
|
Zot
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,616
|
I am in for next year... but I think that we should go with just one quarterback... 2 running backs, 3 WRs, Def, and a Kicker...
I think that the two quarterback system really screwed up a lot of teams... myself included...
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2006, 08:44 AM
|
#798
|
|
Have you ever imagined a world with no hypothetical situations?
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NJ Bit*hes!!!!
Posts: 7,654
|
I will be in again for next year...even if I finish in last place again...
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2006, 08:59 AM
|
#799
|
|
The Stones, I love the Stones. I watch them whenever I can. Fred, Barney...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Jersey
Posts: 3,375
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kirthew
I am in for next year... but I think that we should go with just one quarterback... 2 running backs, 3 WRs, Def, and a Kicker...
I think that the two quarterback system really screwed up a lot of teams... myself included...
|
i agree...lets try it this way...the 2 QB system, was rough...
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2006, 10:32 AM
|
#800
|
|
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kirthew
I am in for next year... but I think that we should go with just one quarterback... 2 running backs, 3 WRs, Def, and a Kicker...
I think that the two quarterback system really screwed up a lot of teams... myself included...
|
Agreed. I drafted 3 QB's, and it worked out for a while (Leftwich got hurt), but injuries and bye weeks make it rough. Technically everyone needs 3 QB's, so there isn't enough to go around. I say 2 WR's and one WR/RB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.
|
