|
|
08-03-2017, 09:52 AM
|
#31
|
I took an IQ test and the results were negative.
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 52
|
Yes I understand the concept of basing off the movies but it still bothers me to think the real world Spino is so much different now which totally takes away the belivability of the JP3 design. Comparatively the T Rex is still more or less the same, even the raptors aren't strayed too far off, at least they still maintain a similar proportion/size/fundamental morphology to the real thing. Whereas Spino is like 70% different now and that's a no go for me personally.
Also please don't take this as any complaints CC as I very much love your products, it's just I can be quite selective sometimes with my JP dinos .
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 10:08 AM
|
#32
|
Sey hallo to my lille fren!
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultrazilla
Yes I understand the concept of basing off the movies but it still bothers me to think the real world Spino is so much different now which totally takes away the belivability of the JP3 design. Comparatively the T Rex is still more or less the same, even the raptors aren't strayed too far off, at least they still maintain a similar proportion/size/fundamental morphology to the real thing. Whereas Spino is like 70% different now and that's a no go for me personally.
Also please don't take this as any complaints CC as I very much love your products, it's just I can be quite selective sometimes with my JP dinos .
|
Well the JP3 Spino was based on what extremely little fossil evidence science had at the time. At the time, it was scientifically accurate more or less. It's only been in the last 3-4 years that more complete Spino fossils have been recovered, and we now have a better idea of what they looked like. Honestly you can always chalk the movie inaccuracies up to how these were genetically manipulated monsters spliced with the DNA of modern animals. Velociraptors weren't as large as they are in the films, and they were also feathered. Dilophosaurs werent that small, and they likely didn't have neck frills or venemous spit. And so on.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 12:36 PM
|
#33
|
I took an IQ test and the results were negative.
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by takuGuy
Well the JP3 Spino was based on what extremely little fossil evidence science had at the time. At the time, it was scientifically accurate more or less. It's only been in the last 3-4 years that more complete Spino fossils have been recovered, and we now have a better idea of what they looked like. Honestly you can always chalk the movie inaccuracies up to how these were genetically manipulated monsters spliced with the DNA of modern animals. Velociraptors weren't as large as they are in the films, and they were also feathered. Dilophosaurs werent that small, and they likely didn't have neck frills or venemous spit. And so on.
|
Yeah I agree about the fossil scarcity at the time and I certainly don't blame JP's effort of creating it to the best of their knowledge. Question is will they change the design to the most updated version for future films? Anyway I hope to see at least some type of sauropod from CC and preferably in scale with 1/20 BreakOut Rex.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 01:43 PM
|
#34
|
Sey hallo to my lille fren!
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultrazilla
Yeah I agree about the fossil scarcity at the time and I certainly don't blame JP's effort of creating it to the best of their knowledge. Question is will they change the design to the most updated version for future films? Anyway I hope to see at least some type of sauropod from CC and preferably in scale with 1/20 BreakOut Rex.
|
Same reason they gave for the raptors not having feathers in Jurassic World: maintaining in-universe continuity.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 01:53 PM
|
#35
|
Sailor Moon
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,282
|
I watched World again on my flight home. Man, that was painful.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 09:50 PM
|
#36
|
I took an IQ test and the results were negative.
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by takuGuy
Same reason they gave for the raptors not having feathers in Jurassic World: maintaining in-universe continuity.
|
Not necessarily, they changed the look and pose of stegosaurus in Jurassic World where its tail is low hung instead of high raised in The Lost World. So something as fundamentally different as the new Spino would probably receive more attention too.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:56 PM
|
#37
|
Nightwing
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,582
|
The 1/20 scale definitely needs to represent the larger dinosaurs:
- Brachiosaurus (Would be 30 inches, but badass)
- Triceratops
- Bull T-Rex
- Spinosaurus
- Mosasaurus (Jumping out of the water was a great idea)
Maquettes for the smaller dinos
- Velociraptor
- Dilophosaurus
- Pteranadon (Lost World branch scene)
- Triceratops
I'd also love dioramas of the park itself:
- JP Gate
- Visitors Center
- Raptor Paddock
|
|
|
08-04-2017, 09:11 AM
|
#38
|
Chronicle Collectibles
Producer
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,478
|
Parallax,
Most of what you have listed is getting made.
Paul
|
|
|
08-04-2017, 01:40 PM
|
#39
|
Mephisto
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 443
|
Can't wait to see the next offerings from CC, very excited for raptors in the kitchen!
|
|
|
08-04-2017, 08:44 PM
|
#40
|
Mephisto
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: India
Posts: 439
|
Spino in lively pose similar to irex
Jp jeep
Raptor vs rex diorama
Tlw raptor mini head bust 1:3
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 PM.