Quote:
Originally Posted by ShinShoryuken
A very bizarre post indeed.
Different you say? 
Our monitor's display images in RGB.
Camera's detect information based on a manufactored sensor and lens.
Whereas, our eyes reflect light to display the raw colours as they are.
OFCOURSE the pictures are going to differ.
You sound upset because i couldnt replicate perfect accuracy through a sh1tty iphone camera and transfer it to your RGB monitor.
Impossible you say... ask any Akuma owner here if pictures do him any justice.
I stand by my statement; he looks much better in person.
Let us know when you get yours.
TIP: I purposely use natural lighting for my shots. Works much better for bringing out details. |
Ive got mine in hand. I posted a pic next to the Shin Bust. He is very impressive in person and I'm not upset.
A person asked about your photo because of the enhanced detail it had. I cant remember any other time in this thread where someone asked that question about someones photo. Its pretty obvious your photos look different than he does in person.
If you think he looks better than that type of detail thats been enhanced you are free to have that opinion.
I just think its a weird thing to enhance the look or specific details and then when someone ask if it looks that way, tell them it looks better. Why enhance it at all then? I like how your pictures look. I used one of yours a few weeks ago to send to a buddy to show him what I was hype about. But they are tinkered with. So if someone asks, maybe just tell them you used a filter or PS. Its really not a big deal.
There are plenty of photos in this thread where he looks 99% like the photo. IMO anyway.
A photo cant capture the presence of a 30 inch statue that is a masterpiece. But that isnt what is really being discussed here.
Anyway feel free to reply, but I've said my peace on it. I'm not really upset or even care that much. Just figured I would point out for that person asking questions that the photo had been touched up.
