|
View Poll Results: XM Studios - Kang the Conqueror?
|
|
Absolutely yes for Kang
|
   
|
17 |
38.64% |
|
No time for Kang. Other characters deserve it more...
|
  
|
16 |
36.36% |
|
Who's Kang?
|
  
|
11 |
25.00% |
 |
|
02-09-2015, 08:45 AM
|
#11
|
|
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 153
|
Does not look like Krang at all, ow wait that is another character  .
Would prefer a new Apocalypse XM style though.
|
|
|
|
02-09-2015, 11:46 AM
|
#12
|
|
Crime Syndicate
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 7,539
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawnknome
Kang is an amazing villain. I voted yes, but honestly I think there are some better choices out there. I think down the line, XM should consider this for an option, but right now there are a ton more heavier hitters they can tackle.
(Please do Super Skrull)
|
Agreed. This is a splendid choice for down the line in a slot between to heavy hitters.
|
|
|
|
|
02-09-2015, 02:04 PM
|
#13
|
|
Blue Falcon
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 553
|
Oh god yes.
|
|
|
|
|
02-09-2015, 02:18 PM
|
#14
|
|
Alpha Flight
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,551
|
100% a very important and brilliant char. For me close to Doom.
|
|
|
|
|
02-09-2015, 03:30 PM
|
#15
|
|
Doctor Doom
Adamantium Plus Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 16,058
|
I got love for you so I'll vote yes to whack ass Kang.
|
|
|
|
|
02-09-2015, 11:09 PM
|
#16
|
|
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Cali
Posts: 157
|
Don't need kang. Prefer sinister
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2015, 10:09 PM
|
#17
|
|
Advanced Tweet Mechanic
Adamantium Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yesterday's Future...
Posts: 48,155
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mammal
Oh god yes.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by equi-nox76
100% a very important and brilliant char. For me close to Doom.
|
YES! Thanks!
Quote:
Originally Posted by The General
I got love for you so I'll vote yes to whack ass Kang.
|
YES! waitasecond... 
Quote:
Originally Posted by drkknight65
Don't need kang. Prefer sinister
|
Damn you 
|
|
|
|
|
02-12-2015, 01:13 AM
|
#18
|
|
Rescue
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 15,987
|
Only thing I ever read with Kang in it was the Infinity War but I love his design so voted yes.
I think he is about the only villain that could take on Doom.
Bowen needs to do the contemplating pose with his hands behind his back. 1/4 is too big for that so it needs to be something with action.
Pro-tip: when doing a poll like this leave out the option to choose the antithesis to your goal. Let the opposition reign in silence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.
