New Ghostbusters movie...Finally a real sequel!!!

[Augen]

Originally Posted by Frankierock

https://www.ign.com/articles/2019/01...trump-would-do

Leslie Jones went ballistic when she found out about this "new"movie...
First of all this shouldn't be a Men Vs Women thing...it's a pure movie and business thing..your Movie Stunk and was technically not a Reboot but more and alternate universe version of Ghostbusters.
So having a true Sequel is not a Reboot with men...it's called Part 3.
If the Female Ghostbusters was any good there would have been a part 2 even with the Real part 3 coming out. It was planned for years, just could never be agreed upon.

Hollywood is a joke nowadays, there are only a few writers willing to make new movies...there should be a ban on all reboots...let's make original movies again. I mean how long before we get a E.T or Jaws Reboot...leave well enough alone. Very hard to make great movies better by doing a Reboot.

I don't think Spielberg has had a movie of his remade. Jurassic World is the closest one I can think of, but it acts as much as a sequel as a soft reboot.

[SONICobra]

the irony is the terrible movie she was in made it seem like the original movies "dint count"

[The General]

I guess I'm the only one that enjoyed the female Ghostbusters movie.

[MrYac]

Originally Posted by The General

I guess I'm the only one that enjoyed the female Ghostbusters movie.

You just might be

[built2shred]

The Female Ghostbusters, that was not a good movie IMO... It made $229 million worldwide on a $144 million budget... but when you add in all the expensive of advertising it, I doubt Sony made any money on this movie... or very little which ultimately means no squeal.

I think Leslie anger is more about her not getting a squeal to her movie... Also it's easier to pull the sexiest card then admit you made a bad movie.

Her Movie pretty much ignored the first two Ghostbusters movies so they're really not related IMO, her movie was more of a reboot then a true sequel to the original ones... So I personally don't see any issue with adding another sequel to the original movie... But if women start saying it's sexist and what not I doubt any of the original stars will want to do the sequel, I doubt it would be worth the headache...

[Vecchio1]

Her rage rant was really funny and ridiculous at the same time.

[JP Sarri]

Originally Posted by The General

I guess I'm the only one that enjoyed the female Ghostbusters movie.

I did too and my manhood is still intact.

[MrYac]

Originally Posted by JP Sarri

I did too and my manhood is still intact.

honestly though it's fine if people liked it, it's more the "well clearly you a trump lovin' sexist!" if you didn't attitude that is what makes most people outright hate the movie.

[Augen]

Originally Posted by built2shred

The Female Ghostbusters, that was not a good movie IMO... It made $229 million worldwide on a $144 million budget... but when you add in all the expensive of advertising it, I doubt Sony made any money on this movie... or very little which ultimately means no squeal.

I think Leslie anger is more about her not getting a squeal to her movie... Also it's easier to pull the sexiest card then admit you made a bad movie.

Her Movie pretty much ignored the first two Ghostbusters movies so they're really not related IMO, her movie was more of a reboot then a true sequel to the original ones... So I personally don't see any issue with adding another sequel to the original movie... But if women start saying it's sexist and what not I doubt any of the original stars will want to do the sequel, I doubt it would be worth the headache...

The general rule is a film has to double its production budget to turn a profit. Some films may avoid this will ancillary revenue such as merchandise.

[The General]

Originally Posted by JP Sarri

I did too and my manhood is still intact.

lol Mine too.