PCS: Street Fighter - Chun-Li Powerlifting 1/4 Statue

[qz33]

Originally Posted by xellos49698

Nothing qz33, as far as I can tell Chun-Li looks exactly the way it supposed to in the video.

Regarding the owners 'complaints' on you-tube about lack of muscle definition, I was just curious about how much harder would it have been for PCS to add a little more definition to Chun-Li muscles like the guy was complaining about?

I'm not saying PCS promised anything beyond what was shown in the video.

Does it really increase the cost of production that much or is PCS just taking a lazy approach?

Why is it a "lazy" approach though? Variants by their very nature imply cost cutting. Just an extra $100 changes potential sales and everything else.
It is supposed to be a realistic defined leg or just an animated VG leg? The legs also double as sweats/leggings for the variant.
Sure they could have sculpted a separate lower half for each statue. Probably not very expensive but then the factory would have charged more to have another tooling piece to make molds for.

The question is kinda rhetorical as "money" solves nearly all superficial problems but who should pay? PCS or customers? I'll give you a hint: anything a company does is paid for by its customers whether they charge separately or not. So either all the statues would have cost more or just the bare leg variant.

Was this criticism around when this was being showcased?

[Shoo]

Originally Posted by Cyber-Lip

The reviewer is on crack lol. He makes a bunch of really dumb points. It looks exactly like the promo pics, so it's as if he never looked at the pics before buying it. Why did this joker even buy it in the first place if he dislikes it so much??...baffling.

Well, the guy uploads vertical videos to YouTube, after all.

Here's the link, by the way:

[IceDog]

Originally Posted by Shoo

Well, the guy uploads vertical videos to YouTube, after all.

What a monster

[ukshaun]

Originally Posted by IceDog

What a monster

Absolute monster!

I am 100% not a fan of this type of image orientation when it comes to videos.

[xellos49698]

Thanks qz33, so most likely we would have pay about 100 dollars extra.

As for is extra muscle definition worth the extra cost? Don't know, maybe it would have been impressive enough to be worth the extra price if it was done right.

I understand everything already cost more these days, so cutting cost is important. Just was wondering, that is all.

And yeah, this youtube video is terrible in terms of how it was shot and that there is no view from the back.

Also, as mention before, the guy is clearly upset about something that wasn't in the original release pictures. He should have done his research better.

It's always the hope that a statue turns out better, however, there are plenty of times they turn out worse then exceptions and that is not happening here. What PCS showed is what they sent out, at least from the front anyhow, can't speak for the back yet. lol

[AlexLothos]

Originally Posted by ukshaun

Absolute monster!

I am 100% not a fan of this type of image orientation when it comes to videos.

[Hobbyist]

He seems to enjoy stroking her legs.

[Cyber-Lip]

"Hi PCS customer service?...I'd like to return my Chun Li. It looks too close to the advertised photos"

[Augen]

Hoping to get an update, still at shipping but no tracking a month later.

[Forps is back]

You seem to not get what the reviewer was implying. That this piece is so cheap looking and outdated that it should have cost 300 bucks at most in the FIRST PLACE.

Well, make it 50 bucks, pal. This looks so simple, so outdated and so cheap that even 300 bucks is reaching. IN THE FIRST PLACE he seemed to imply.

Nevertheless, it is his opinion (and a grounded one, if you ask me). Why are you all mocking him? Is he not allowed to his opinion having the piece in front of him? Crazy times