|
|
08-27-2012, 08:37 PM
|
#31
|
Kindly Asked To Leave
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 24,710
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by risingstar
What if the Ex takes the house AND the frame?
|
Thankfully, my art (framed and otherwise) made it out alive.
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 08:45 PM
|
#32
|
Jedi Order
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Habs Nation
Posts: 28,141
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Argonus
Thankfully, my art (framed and otherwise) made it out alive.
|
Note to self: Hide cash inside the frame!
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 08:47 PM
|
#33
|
Kindly Asked To Leave
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 24,710
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by risingstar
Note to self: Hide cash inside the frame!
|
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 08:55 PM
|
#34
|
Hercules
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,814
|
dunno if thats a good idea, as much as you guys love your art i'd think in a reall bad divorce it would find it's way to the dishwasher
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 09:06 PM
|
#35
|
Love me sexy
Adamantium Plus Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Awe-strail-ya
Posts: 10,645
|
My wife has already made it clear that if things go south in our marriage, she'll be taking a hammer to my statue collection. Scary stuff (yet oddly arousing)
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 09:09 PM
|
#36
|
Mandarin
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: My House
Posts: 16,731
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Argonus
I don't see any harm in doing so if you're only doing it once, to frame and display in your house.
|
Exactly. I am not interested in having printed pieces of art on my walls - but anyone who does so is not breaking any laws - it's just silly to think otherwise.
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 09:13 PM
|
#37
|
Hercules
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: By a Lake in NC
Posts: 14,926
|
I dont care whAt anyone does, but i find it Funny how misinformed many still are especially as to whether someone must be looking to profit in order to violate a copyright.
Think about the people who downloaded songs for their own use
Yes, it would be copyright infringement. Yes, it is morally wrong as you would be knowingly taking the property of an artist for which they have the moral rights.
And also, someone displaying their works is not an invitation or explicit consent for you to take their works.
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 09:17 PM
|
#38
|
Hercules
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: By a Lake in NC
Posts: 14,926
|
I know many do not want to accept that the law is an unauthorized copy for personal use with no gain is copyright infringement, but it is. That's the way the law is written. Just like going 26 in a 25 mph zone is speeding. Will you get prosecuted or sued? Very very unlikely but the law is what the law is
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 09:31 PM
|
#39
|
Kindly Asked To Leave
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 24,710
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog07
And also, someone displaying their works is not an invitation or explicit consent for you to take their works.
|
I only display art that I've bought, be it paintings, OA, commissions.. whatever.
.. I don't understand why some people would duplicate someone else's work (I mean download/photocopy/etc, not "attempt to recreate".. actually BOTH of those would apply, here) and sell it to make a profit... well, I DO understand why, but it's incredibly bad juju to do so.
|
|
|
08-27-2012, 09:34 PM
|
#40
|
Hercules
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: By a Lake in NC
Posts: 14,926
|
A Massachusetts court just upheld the $675,000 verdict against a man for downloading 30 songs.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 AM.