Superman: Call to Action PF

[chronos1919]

Originally Posted by Rycher

Well, whether a piece of rubble on the ground that he could launch off of (when there is already rubble on the base) would be forced is surely a matter of debate, no?

Which is why I prefaced my statement with "to me", though it should be clear that anything I post is my opinion and not absolute fact.

Originally Posted by Rycher

To your second point, it is interesting how you phrased that -- it almost seems as though you are implying that selling the piece for that concern was foolhardy. But it was a costly piece, and I wasn't about to rest $600+ on hope.

Still, if my concern about the engineering of this piece makes you anxious, you're welcome to ignore my posts.

My point was, if you were too anxious about a similarly designed statue holding up over time, why buy another? Wouldn't you have similar anxiety?

Try not to feel attacked. Or, you know, you can just ignore my posts.

[Rycher]

Originally Posted by chronos1919

Which is why I prefaced my statement with "to me", though it should be clear that anything I post is my opinion and not absolute fact.

C'mon now. The opinion you expressed was that it ruins the art of the statue when they have to force multiple contact points. The statement of fact was that they have to force multiple contact points.

Originally Posted by chronos1919

My point was, if you were too anxious about a similarly designed statue holding up over time, why buy another? Wouldn't you have similar anxiety?

Try not to feel attacked. Or, you know, you can just ignore my posts.

I expressed a minor concern about a statue which myself and others will drop over half a grand on, and you're contribution was "this is not a statue for you". If this is the extent of your wisdom, I assure you that you do not have to convince me to ignore your posts.

And whoever said I thought you were attacking me? Were you curiously dismissive of my concern? Sure. Were you "attacking" me? Don't think so. Maybe I missed something.

But just so there's no more confusion going forward, I was under the impression this was a discussion forum about statues where people could, you know, discuss statues. My mistake. I apologize for making comments about a statue on this forum intended for making comments about statues. Carry on.

[chronos1919]

Originally Posted by Rycher

C'mon now. The opinion you expressed was that it ruins the art of the statue when they have to force multiple contact points. The statement of fact was that they have to force multiple contact points.

I expressed a minor concern about a statue which myself and others will drop over half a grand on, and you're contribution was "this is not a statue for you". If this is the extent of your wisdom, I assure you that you do not have to convince me to ignore your posts.

And whoever said I thought you were attacking me? Were you curiously dismissive of my concern? Sure. Were you "attacking" me? Don't think so. Maybe I missed something.

But just so there's no more confusion going forward, I was under the impression this was a discussion forum about statues where people could, you know, discuss statues. My mistake. I apologize for making comments about a statue on this forum intended for making comments about statues. Carry on.

You're very whiny. Try taking a nap maybe?

[Rycher]

Originally Posted by chronos1919

You're very whiny. Try taking a nap maybe?

Oh, brother. I didn't realize I was talking to an imbecile. I don't have the time or patience to go back and forth with you, nor do I wish to derail this thread any further with this nonsense. If you like, you can private message me (I won't respond ) to vent whatever frustrations you have over my posts.

[chronos1919]

Originally Posted by Rycher

Oh, brother. I didn't realize I was talking to an imbecile. I don't have the time or patience to go back and forth with you, nor do I wish to derail this thread any further with this nonsense. If you like, you can private message me (I won't respond ) to vent whatever frustrations you have over my posts.

Cool, your tantrum is over. Moving on...

[Rycher]

I don't know what the guy above me is on about, but I seem to be living rent free in his head.

Anyway, to get things back on track, I think this piece will pair nicely with the Man of Steel Alex Ross print they released a while back.



I wonder if they will do a similarly inspired Batman piece to go with his Batman print.

[chronos1919]

Originally Posted by Rycher

I don't know what the guy above me is on about, but I seem to be living rent free in his head.

You just can’t quit me, can you?

I was talking about your idiotic rant. I thought I was using simple enough words for you, but it still went over your head.



So, yes, back to the topic at hand. I’d really like a Lois Lane statue to accompany this. It’s doubtful, but if they were ever going to make one it would be a good companion to have, standing by Clark as he runs off.

Honestly, as I think about it, I’m not sure how they would design Lois so that she didn’t appear to be just a random, black haired woman...

Something like this, maybe, with a Daily Planet press badge?

[Rycher]

Originally Posted by chronos1919

You just can’t quit me, can you?

I was talking about your idiotic rant. I thought I was using simple enough words for you, but it still went over your head.

Okay, this has gotten out of hand. We've both called each other idiots now over a statue of a comic book character that hasn't even been released. I say we bury the hatchet right now and call it even.

As for your suggestion of a Lois Lane statue, I hate it.

[chronos1919]

Originally Posted by Rycher

Okay, this has gotten out of hand. We've both called each other idiots now over a statue of a comic book character that hasn't even been released. I say we bury the hatchet right now and call it even.

As for your suggestion of a Lois Lane statue, I hate it.

Agreed.

And I hate your ideas too.

[Rycher]

Originally Posted by chronos1919

Agreed.

And I hate your ideas too.