|
|
|
|
|
|
03-28-2021, 04:06 PM
|
#451
|
Sey hallo to my lille fren!
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 142
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade3327
I feel like this and the Warrior are a bit too skinny, like the sculpts have been idealized to capture what the creature "should've" or "would've" looked like in the world of the film rather than the suit. Bolaji was already a slender guy, but if the Prime 1 sculpt were the suit, he'd have to have been a toothpick. I think the body mass and head proportions look better on the CoolProps and Sano.
If I had to go for this, I'd pick the action pose because the museum version (as much as I like it) would draw too much attention to the inaccuracies above. That pose ought to be reserved for truly faithful recreations.
|
I agree that it is a bit on the skinny side, but as you said, I think they are using some artistic license with it and trying to cover 3 bases, accuracy, suit form and interpretation. As much as I have always loved the original design, I've grown bored with the static pose. Trying too hard to alter the look and you'll end up with something weird like the Sideshow's awkward 1/3 maquette with the twisty body and floppy wrist. The slight shift of the body on this works perfectly here imo.
|
|
|
03-28-2021, 08:21 PM
|
#452
|
Jedi Order
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sonora
Posts: 26,617
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonytiger
They Normally come at night..Mostly
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strychnine
I agree that it is a bit on the skinny side, but as you said, I think they are using some artistic license with it and trying to cover 3 bases, accuracy, suit form and interpretation. As much as I have always loved the original design, I've grown bored with the static pose. Trying too hard to alter the look and you'll end up with something weird like the Sideshow's awkward 1/3 maquette with the twisty body and floppy wrist. The slight shift of the body on this works perfectly here imo.
|
|
|
|
04-01-2021, 02:03 PM
|
#453
|
Jedi Order
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sonora
Posts: 26,617
|
Does anyone know any updated ship dates for this?
|
|
|
04-01-2021, 02:38 PM
|
#454
|
Loki
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,504
|
The Warrior is Jan-March next year.
Add 1 month for CNYear and 2 months delay, result in June-July 2022.
My guess for both Big Chaps is 2 months behind that, so prob around Sept-2022
|
|
|
04-01-2021, 04:31 PM
|
#455
|
Nightwing
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 1,541
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halcyon
The Warrior is Jan-March next year.
Add 1 month for CNYear and 2 months delay, result in June-July 2022.
My guess for both Big Chaps is 2 months behind that, so prob around Sept-2022
|
How does that work? The Big Chap went up for preorder a while before the Warrior did. According to Prime 1's site, the Big Chap is slated for Mar-Jun 2021 and the Warrior for Sep-Dec 2021.
|
|
|
04-01-2021, 07:07 PM
|
#456
|
Jedi Order
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sonora
Posts: 26,617
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade3327
How does that work? The Big Chap went up for preorder a while before the Warrior did. According to Prime 1's site, the Big Chap is slated for Mar-Jun 2021 and the Warrior for Sep-Dec 2021.
|
That's more like it. Thanks, Blade!
|
|
|
04-02-2021, 03:16 PM
|
#457
|
Jedi Order
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sonora
Posts: 26,617
|
Hmmmm. Ordered this from Spec Fiction. Now they aren't listing any P1 stuff. Hope they didn't break up!
|
|
|
04-02-2021, 06:01 PM
|
#458
|
Nightwing
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 1,541
|
I emailed Todd to see what the deal is and he said they should be back up, preorders won't be affected.
|
|
|
04-02-2021, 06:19 PM
|
#459
|
Jedi Order
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sonora
Posts: 26,617
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade3327
I emailed Todd to see what the deal is and he said they should be back up, preorders won't be affected.
|
I figured that was a possibility. Thanks a bunch, Blade.
|
|
|
04-02-2021, 11:35 PM
|
#460
|
The X-Men
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: MN
Posts: 1,066
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strychnine
I agree that it is a bit on the skinny side, but as you said, I think they are using some artistic license with it and trying to cover 3 bases, accuracy, suit form and interpretation. As much as I have always loved the original design, I've grown bored with the static pose. Trying too hard to alter the look and you'll end up with something weird like the Sideshow's awkward 1/3 maquette with the twisty body and floppy wrist. The slight shift of the body on this works perfectly here imo.
|
Dude..This was original made from a actor in a rubber suit with floppy hands..
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 PM.
|